Can Free Meals Change Your Marks?

Malnutrition is a significant global issue with widespread effects on children’s educational outcomes, especially in developing countries. Have you ever been in class hungry, really trying your best to concentrate? How did that turn out for you? Now imagine having to do that daily. Will you even want to come to school, let alone listen to your teacher?

UNICEF reports that this is the situation of millions of children worldwide. This affects their cognitive growth, focus, and school performance. The situation is particularly worse in sub-Saharan Africa, where most children attend school on empty stomachs, limiting their educational potential. Hunger is linked to decreased attention span, poor memory, and academic struggles.

Battling Hunger

School feeding programmes have become a widely adopted strategy to combat undernutrition and improve academic outcomes. Their objectives are to provide meals that improve enrolment, attendance, retention, and learning. Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, and several other countries have introduced national school feeding programmes with varying degrees of success. Let’s compare the first three countries, huh?

Nigeria: More Students in School…

Did you know that about 32 per cent of children under the age of five years in Nigeria are stunted, the second-highest burden in the world? This has lasting effects on cognitive growth and learning capacity. Nigeria has the National Home-Grown School Feeding Programme (NHGSFP), which aims to enhance the nutritional status of children as well as their school attendance, particularly in primary school. This initiative has been linked to higher school enrolment and better school attendance, especially in rural and low-income populations.

The World Food Programme (WFP) suggests that school feeding programmes typically lead to higher participation rates— estimates around the globe have indicated up to 9 per cent improvement in enrolment in low-income populations. This has been noted in Nigeria, especially among girls, who tend to go to school when they are fed. Despite these benefits, the programme has not been as successful in affecting actual academic performance, in part due to problems such as intermittent funding, substandard food quality, and ineffective monitoring. These restrictions indicate that the Nigerian programme is effective in increasing access to education, but its impact on learning outcomes will need to be enhanced.

Kenya: Food Meets Performance

On the other hand, Kenya is more convinced of the beneficial role of school feeding programmes in participation and academic performance. The Kenyan school feeding programme is a national initiative sponsored by the World Food Programme and the national government to assist children in arid and semi-arid regions where food insecurity is the greatest. The data provided by WFP indicates that the programme is reaching more than 1.6 million children and has greatly enhanced school attendance, with up to a 15 per cent increment recorded in certain areas.

Besides better attendance, school feeding in Kenya has been associated with increased concentration and thus, active participation in classes since children can concentrate better when they are not hungry, right? The research also shows that students who have access to school meals achieve better results in literacy and numeracy tests. This evidence is also supported by UNESCO, which reported that worldwide school feeding programmes lead to an average increase of 8 per cent in school attendance. Kenya’s success can be explained by steady funding, effective institutional collaboration and implementation strategies that focus on vulnerable groups.

Ghana: A Balanced Approach

Likewise, Ghana offers a great example of how the organised application of school feeding programmes can lead to increased access and achievements. The Ghana School Feeding Programme (GSFP) is a government-sponsored program, aided by development partners like the World Bank. Research indicates that enrolment has grown by about 12 per cent in beneficiary schools, and the attendance rate has also improved, especially in the deprived districts.

More to the point, there are indications that the programme led to improved academic performance, particularly in reading and mathematics. Children in schools with feeding programmes perform better. This shows a direct relationship between better nutrition and learning. The Ghana model is reinforced with local agricultural systems that guarantee a constant food supply, increasing the sustainability of the programmes. Nonetheless, as in Nigeria, Ghana continues to experience problems such as delays in funding and logistical difficulties, but these are less acute.

Tying it all up

Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana show similarities and differences in the effectiveness of school feeding programmes. The three countries show an increase in the number of students attending schools and the number of schools being enrolled in, but disparities occur in academic performance. Kenya showed the greatest improvement in learning outcomes, followed by Ghana, while Nigeria showed a much greater influence on access to education. The differences may be attributed to implementation methods, funding patterns, monitoring systems, and integration with the wider educational and nutritional policies. Countries with stronger institutional support and better programme management are more likely to have better academic outcomes.

​

Conclusion

To sum up, school feeding programmes are essential to counteract the adverse impacts of malnutrition on education. As shown by Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana, these programmes affect school enrolment, attendance and retention, expanding access to education by vulnerable children. Nevertheless, the degree of academic performance improvement differs by country, depending on the quality of implementation and policy support.

So what’s your take on the matter–should every school provide meals, or is there more needed to truly improve learning?